To commemorate the 10 year anniversary of the Open Source Definition, its author Bruce Perens (former Debian Project Leader and noted Free-Software developer) has written a very worthwhile essay explaining the current state of Open Source and outlining the next decade for the Open Source movement.
Notable pieces from Bruce’s essay are outlined herein:
And that brings me to our first mistake: for a time, there was a conflict between Open Source and Free Software evangelism. My intent has always been for Open Source to simply be another way of talking about Free Software, tailored to the ears of business people, and that it would eventually lead them to a greater appreciation of Richard Stallman’s arguments. This has come to pass, and I hope you’ll continue to make it so. One only had to witness the attendance of the GPL 3 committees to see that the importance of FSF’s work was appreciated by the largest of corporations.
For me, this is the single most important message to make people aware of: Open Source is a ‘business-friendly’ term to spread the philosophy and principles of Free-Software. The GNU foundation does tremendous work in enabling, and preserving, software freedom’s for users. It is of great sadness to me that people I talk to are at times completely unaware of the term ‘Free-Software’, instead thinking that this software is ‘Free as in no-cost’, rather than ‘Free as in Freedom’. Richard Stallman is owed an extremely large debt for his vision in creating the FSF and ensuring software freedom’s for all.
In contrast, we have not yet achieved the penetration that we might have desired on user desktop systems, at least if you don’t count the fact that Free Software provides a large part of Apple’s MacOS today, and critical elements of Microsoft Windows as well. Both companies have been forced to develop strategies to live with us, some of them less comfortable than others. Today we are seeing much of the value of software move from the desktop to the network, an area in which we are already entrenched. This can only lead to the expansion of Open Source on the systems in individual user’s hands.
This is a very realistic point: GNU+Linux penetration on the desktop is growing daily; users are realising that proprietary software and vendor lock-in is something that they no longer have to be part of - they can possess software freedom with GNU+Linux - primarily first on Server, but now on Desktop. The next decade will be pivotal in ensuring GNU+Linux on the Desktop penetrates to the masses.
One recent phenomenon has been the appearance of government officials openly on the stage at conferences concerning Free Software. Of late, it’s my turn to speak when the minister has finished his greeting, and they are always announcing some national government initiative concerning Open Source. OK, I speak outside of the U.S. a lot, but even in the U.S. we are seeing Linux (and presumably the GNU system)
Free-Software is here to stay: it is used both by Enterprises and Governments. Ignore the FUD from Proprietary vendors who tell you that Free and Open Source Software bears a heavier risk than using proprietary software.
Remember also, when you are using a ‘Linux’ machine, you are more than likely using the GNU System, be your distribution from Red Hat, Debian, Mandriva, Gentoo, Slackware et al. Go and tell people about the GNU System!
Microsoft remains a problem, as the bastion of the old way of thinking about software, and as the epitome of the old school of dirty corporate fighting. Their current strategy seems to be to poison us with money, most recently by making patent agreements with a number of Linux distributions. These agreements go against the spirit of the software licenses used by our developers, and were perhaps intended to dissuade developers from contributing their work. To this end, Microsoft poured more money into Novell last year than Novell’s annual profit - indeed Novell would have had no annual profit without Microsoft.
A very articulate observation from Perens.
Perens closes by stating that:
So, you can see that the future will present its challenges for Open Source. We could never have forecast how big we would become during Decade Zero of Open Source. But we’ve built tremendous strength, to the point that we can consider much larger tasks. Join us now, as we enter Decade One.
Please do take time to read the original article located at Perens’ personal website.